Skip to main content

National Institutes of Health

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

2020 Annual Report of the Division of Intramural Research

Transcriptional Control of Cell Specification and Differentiation

Jeffrey Farrell
  • Jeffrey A. Farrell, PhD, Stadtman Investigator, Head, Unit on Cell Specification and Differentiation
  • Paulina Capar, MSc, Technician
  • Abhinav Sur, PhD, Postdoctoral Visiting Fellow
  • Jeremy Popowitz, BSc, Postbaccalaureate Intramural Research Training Award Fellow
  • Eric Upton, BSc, Postbaccalaureate Intramural Research Training Award Fellow

Animals consist of a collection of cells with diverse shapes, structures, and functions, a diversity that is rebuilt from scratch by every embryo. Understanding the genetic programs that direct the process is the central mystery of developmental and regenerative biology. We are interested in how decisions about what cell type to adopt are controlled, and what genetic programs direct the morphological and functional specialization of different cells.

The single-cell revolution in developmental biology has given us new access and new tools to address these questions. I previously developed high temporal-resolution single-cell RNA sequencing approaches to identify transcriptional trajectories, i.e., the ‘highways’ or most likely paths through gene expression that cells take during development. From such data, we were able to identify the sequence of genes expressed by individual cell types during early development, which provides insight into the genetic programs that regulate cells’ choice of cell type and then their downstream functional transformations at a wider breadth than was previously achievable. Work in the lab focuses on more deeply exploring such processes, using the approaches we developed. Our lab combines single-cell genomics, imaging, genetic, and classical embryological approaches to investigate the genetic control of cell specification and differentiation during vertebrate embryogenesis. We focus on zebrafish embryos as a model system to study these questions, because among vertebrates, they are easy to culture, image, and manipulate, both embryologically and genetically.

Figure 1. Transcriptional trajectories in early zebrafish development

Figure 1

Click image to view.

Single-cell transcriptomes were isolated from zebrafish embryos at 12 developmental stages spanning 3–12 hours post-fertilization. The branching transcriptional trajectories, which represent the gene expression events that give rise to 25 different differentiated cell types, were then reconstructed using URD, software that we developed and published in 2018.

Genetic underpinnings of cell differentiation

Once a cell has been specified, it must acquire the particular morphology and functionality of its cell type through the process of differentiation, a process that is driven by cell type–specific expression of differentiation genes and often results in dramatic changes in basic cell-biological processes. We aim to identify those genes that drive differentiation and understand their regulation. To do this, we will generate a single-cell RNAseq atlas spanning a larger timespan of zebrafish embryonic development, find the cascade of genes expressed during differentiation in every cell type, determine their membership in functional gene modules (groups of genes that work together), and associate them with that cell type’s cell-biological transformations during differentiation. The studies will permit comparisons of differentiation-gene deployment across cell types to understand the reuse of differentiation programs during development.

Consequences of heterogeneous developmental trajectories

Distinct cell types can arise through many developmental trajectories or developmental histories. We and others have observed refinement at the boundaries between groups of cells specified to become different tissues; at such boundaries, some cells switch from one specification state to another. We use the axial mesoderm as a model and seek to understand: (1) what drives cell-type switching; (2) what are the long-term consequences for a cell that switched; and (3) what mechanisms assist in successful switching.

Effect of environmental insults on developmental choices

During early embryogenesis, a field of equipotent cells are instructed to initiate different gene-expression programs by external developmental signals and cell-intrinsic cues. We recently observed that cells that experience DNA damage in early zebrafish embryos initiate an unusual transcriptional response during a very limited window in development. Moreover, most damaged cells are not eliminated but appear to be excluded from contributing to some tissues in the animal, which suggests that responding to DNA damage may affect cells’ choices during development and which raises a question of how that occurs. We are investigating: (1) the fate of cells in early development that experience DNA damage; (2) the role this unusual transcriptional response plays; and (3) what drives the bias in damaged cells’ future cell type.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Click image to view.

Overview of ongoing research projects


  1. Farrell JA, Wang Y, Riesenfeld SJ, Shekhar K, Regev A, Schier AF. Single-cell reconstruction of developmental trajectories during zebrafish embryogenesis. Science 2018;360:eaar3131.
  2. Siebert S, Farrell JA, Cazet J, Abeykoon Y, Primack A, Schnitzler C, Juliano CE. Stem cell differentiation trajectories in Hydra resolved at single-cell resolution. Science 2019;365:eaav9314.
  3. Raj B, Farrell JA, Liu J, El Kholtei J, Carte AN, Navajas Acedo J, Du LY, McKenna A, Relic D, Leslie JM, Schier AF. Emergence of neuronal diversity during vertebrate brain development. Neuron 2020;108(6):1058-1074.e6.


  • James Gagnon, PhD, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
  • Celina Juliano, PhD, University of California, Davis, CA


For more information, email

Top of Page